Several of our very own foregoing considerations offer credence to your assertion you to definitely metaphor is actually an enthusiastic analogous label. That is corroborated because of the St Thomas’ process involved thirteen out of the newest Prima Pars , just like the when you look at the blog post around three, as he asks if any name’s told you securely out-of Jesus, this new resistance lead on gamble are anywhere between use proprie and you may improprie toward latter identified with metaphor. Following, within the blog post half a dozen, when he asks in the event that names popular so you’re able to Jesus and you will pets is basic told you off pets, the fresh distinction proprie/improprie is apparently a beneficial subdivision from analogous term. St Thomas begins by proclaiming that “inside omnibus nominibus quae de pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur per respectum ad unum: ainsi que ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur inside the definitione omnium. Ainsi que quia proportion quam significat nomen for every prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur for college papers for sale online the definitione aliorum, ainsi que for each and every posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant post illud primum vel magis vel without.” This is exemplified of the dated reliable, “match.” “Sic therefore omni nomina quae metaphorice de- Deo dicuntur for each prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de Deo: quia dicta de- Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines advertisement reports creaturas.” St. Thomas sees this new resemblance off ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) implied in “cheerful meadow” plus in contacting Jesus an excellent lion.

As he continues to talk out-of almost every other brands “quae non metaphorice dicuntur de Deo,” the brand new clear impression would be the fact he is speaking out-of other occasions from analogous labels than metaphors

Have there been texts in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and analogy? When we seek out the newest opinions on the Metaphysics , we discover St Thomas identifying “potency” towards the analogous and you will equivocal settings. “Potency” function unique. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum offer quosdam analogiae.” This new equivocal methods regarding strength are exemplified by the way we talk about step three to your 3rd energy as well as new cube while the energy of line. “Ainsi que propter hoc for every quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens during the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens within the rem” Again a beneficial proportionality find. These particular equivocal settings really are metaphors is obvious about synchronous passageway in-book Delta inside the placing comments on what St Thomas starts, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” What makes these types of methods metaphorical and not analogical? “Their therefore modis praetermissis, considerandum est de- potentiis, quae reducuntur offer unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, ainsi que omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur post aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” Basically, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor to analogous spends off a reputation since second rather than the previous involve a decrease to help you what exactly is generally denominated from the keyword involved whereas, is always to it need citing, in the text message of Summa i believed the next before, brand new metaphor wasn’t notable regarding the extension proprie on this subject basis. Or is they the manner of your own mention of the what exactly is principally signifed by the title hence distinguishes metaphor regarding example, need proprie away from improprie ? Some thing titled metaphorically is, anyway, brought to feel just like precisely what the identity properly signifies.

What we should is finding is a few technique for justifying the brand new very prominent huge difference regarding metaphor and analogy in a fashion that no desire was designed to Cajetan’s department off example on the attribution and you may best proportionality

An enthusiastic aporia possess demonstrably came up, thus, and its particular resolution could only be had from the choosing what an effective metaphor is actually and you can exactly what a keen analogous name is. Solutions to this type of issues would be to enable us to comprehend the apparently contradictory comments away from Aquinas.